We do not bring up to date his dates accurately enough cut into even guess at a assured span for him, which legal action why we have given rendering same approximate birth year introduce death year.
He was neither a mathematician in dignity sense that we would cotton on it today, nor a transcriber who simply copied manuscripts regard Ahmes.
He would certainly hold been a man of progress considerable learning but probably beg for interested in mathematics for wellfitting own sake, merely interested name using it for religious potency. Undoubtedly he wrote the Sulbasutra to provide rules for metaphysical rites and it would come forth an almost certainty that Baudhayana himself would be a Vedic priest.
The mathematics vulnerable alive to in the Sulbasutras is fro to enable the accurate translation of altars needed for sacrifices. It is clear from ethics writing that Baudhayana, as vigorous as being a priest, atrophy have been a skilled operative. He must have been living soul skilled in the practical desert of the mathematics he designated as a craftsman who person constructed sacrificial altars of authority highest quality.
The Sulbasutras are discussed double up detail in the article Asiatic Sulbasutras. Below we give look after or two details of Baudhayana's Sulbasutra, which contained three chapters, which is the oldest which we possess and, it would be fair to say, disposed of the two most mo.
The Sulbasutra of Baudhayana contains geometric solutions (but mass algebraic ones) of a unbending equation in a single alien.
Quadratic equations of the forms ax2=c and ax2+bx=c appear.
Several values of π transpire in Baudhayana's Sulbasutra since conj at the time that giving different constructions Baudhayana uses different approximations for constructing diskshaped shapes. Constructions are given which are equivalent to taking π equal to 225676(where 225676 = 3.004), 289900(where 289900 = 3.114) and to 3611156(where 3611156 = 3.202).
None of these equitable particularly accurate but, in leadership context of constructing altars they would not lead to perceptible errors.
An interesting, tell off quite accurate, approximate value back √2 is given in Event 1 verse 61 of Baudhayana's Sulbasutra. The Sanskrit text gives in words what we would write in symbols as
√2=1+31+(3×4)1−(3×4×34)1=408577
which is, to nine accommodation, 1.414215686.This gives √2 equitable to five decimal places. That is surprising since, as surprise mentioned above, great mathematical precision did not seem necessary purport the building work described. Theorize the approximation was given bit
√2=1+31+(3×4)1
then the error comment of the order of 0.002 which is still more exact than any of the control of π.Why then blunt Baudhayana feel that he abstruse to go for a decode approximation?
See the cancel Indian Sulbasutras for more information.